A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
In addition for the primary punishment, the court may impose a fine about the offender. The fine’s amount is on the discretion on the court and is meant to function an additional deterrent.
refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how They may be applied in certain types of case.
To be a society, it is actually essential to continue striving for any just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and respect for all individuals’ right to life.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been from the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be regarded as, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy topic on the approval of your competent authority.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it really is unclear the way it relates to any offered situation, typically rendering judgments based to the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances of the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be 1 or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason for your decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted within an argument.
6. Mere involvement in a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, since then he is behind the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his continual incarceration would not serve any beneficial purpose at this stage.
Generally, only an appeal accepted through the court of previous vacation resort will resolve this kind of differences and, For several reasons, this sort of appeals are frequently not granted.
This case has been cited in quite a few subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, plus the rule of law.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load provided to any reported judgment may perhaps rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the most significant tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite check here of what a legal system is there to accomplish, i.e. safe its citizens.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally regarded conviction. Read more
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.